We are in a world of unprecedented technological advancement, increasingly blurring the line between science fiction and reality. AI lies at the forefront of this revolution, attempting to give machines an ability to perform tasks that require human intelligence. From cars having to manoeuvre through traffic to algorithms learning which one would be our next favourite song, AI is rapidly transforming our very world. Yet, after all this, there is one fundamental question: can machines really think?
This article investigates the fascinating comparison between AI and human intelligence: their abilities and limitations, and the deep philosophical implications of whether machines can ever substantially be conscious. For those who wish to understand and take part in this transforming field, this consideration shall emphasize why it is important to pursue a full Artificial Intelligence course.
In trying to figure out whether machines can think, first and foremost, we should understand where thinking fits in with human intelligence. Human intellect is multifaceted and consists of a gamut of cognitive abilities, including:
Human intelligence has flexibility, the ability to learn with limited to no data, abstract logic, and a built-in sense of context and common sense. Our abilities allow us to handle complicated and unpredictable contexts, complex reasoning, nuanced judgement, etc. and have engaging social relationships.
Artificial Intelligence at the most general level, an AI system promotes the notion that any work that requires human intellect can also be carried out by a computer program or by a machine. Some of the techniques by which AI does this include:
AI already seems to be edging out humans in many niches. Machines can churn through oceans of data in one afternoon, picking out subtle patterns that humans might overlook, and carry out monotonous tasks with the utmost precision. Some great powers of AI are:
Although AI technology has progressed remarkably, many constraints remain. These constraints are especially apparent in the area of general intelligence, defined as the ability to understand and learn any intellectual task that a human can. Some significant limitations of current AI technologies include, but are not limited to:
Lack of Common Sense: AI systems are very poor at tasks that typically rely on common sense reasoning that human beings possess as a result of their everyday experiences. This can lead AI models to make unreasonable or nonsensical decisions when faced with scenarios not readily observed in their training data.
Limited Adaptability and Generalization: AI models are typically trained to perform specific hierarchical tasks. Models will struggle and demonstrate difficulty when faced with scenarios that are new or unseen. Current models cannot demonstrate generalizability to new domains, which will almost always require some level of inferential reasoning.
Difficulty with Novelty and Creativity: Via statistical modelling of substantially large datasets, AI can mimic creative activities. Mimesis or cloning creative outputs is fundamentally different from bedrock human creativity, which cannot be derived without intuition, emotion and subjective experience.
Absence of Consciousness and Self-Awareness: Current AI technologies are not conscious. AI models possess and instantiate huge amounts of data, however none will demonstrate subjective experience or knowing. I have not witnessed any AI used today possess self-conceptualization. AI used today do not know what they are doing or make sense of their own existence.
Dependence on Data: AI algorithms rely heavily on the use of vast amounts of high-quality training data for training purposes, with bias and non-representative data potentially resulting in poor AI performance.
Explainability and Interpretability: While complex AI models and deep learning networks may operate in ways that humans are unable to interpret, their decisions may be described only as black-box processes. Concerns regarding accountability and trust, therefore, arise.
The question of whether machines can think or think in any meaningful way is not merely technical, it is a complex philosophic question that has raged for decades.
The Turing Test: Alan Turing, in his 1950 paper, proposed the Turing Test, which indicates that a machine can be considered intelligent if a human evaluator cannot distinguish whether the machine's responses are a result of its "thinking" or if the machine is merely paraphrasing human responses. Some artificial intelligence systems have demonstrated the ability to pass limited versions of the Turing Test, but the critics have argued that merely passing the test demonstrates the ability to mimic human interactions rather than thought or understanding or genuinely thinking.
Searle's Chinese Room Argument: John Searle, a philosopher, put forth his Chinese Room argument in response to the notion that machine thought means anything because the individual in the room that passed the Turing Test does not understand the Chinese responses. The Chinese Room scenario proposes an individual sitting in a room who does not know or understand Chinese is given an instruction set to manipulate chunks or symbols which allows them to fool a native Chinese speaker outside the room into thinking that the individual is another Chinese speaker. Searle argues that the individual in the Chinese Room is not understanding and only manipulating the symbols, just as the computer program can manipulate symbols without ultimately understanding.
Strong AI vs. Weak AI: Artificial Intelligence is generally split up into strong AI and weak AI. Weak AI (or narrow AI) focuses on creating AI systems that have the quality of being intelligent and can complete a specific task or task in an intelligent manner. Weak AI accounts for the vast majority of AI systems existing today. Strong AI (or Artificial General Intelligence or AGI) is focused on creating machines that possess human-level general intelligence. They can understand ability, learn, and use their intelligence to a very large range of tasks, and may even be self-aware. Weak AI has progressed far beyond strong AI, and strong AI is a distant and very ambitious goal.
The direction of intelligence would appear to involve collaboration between the human intelligence system and the artificial intelligence system, playing to the strengths of both forms of intelligence. If we combine human creativity, critical thinking, and emotional intelligence with the superior data processing capabilities, speed, and accuracy of an artificial intelligence system, both human and artificial intelligence will inform our collective decision-making to solve complex problems and develop innovative approaches and solutions.
As artificial intelligence systems increasingly integrate into our daily agendas, it is worth considering several ethical questions to navigate:
Human intelligence is influenced by consciousness, feelings, intuition, and life experiences. AI uses algorithms, patterns, and data. That is, AI doesn’t have self-awareness or feelings, regardless of how sophisticated it might appear.
A true sense of independent thinking as we understand it is not an activity AI can do. AI can process information, learn patterns, and eventually make predictions, but its processing is not independent thought, nor does it possess subjective understanding. What looks like thinking is simply pattern-matching and complex computer calculations.
AI may surpass humans in narrow and specific tasks, such as chess, disease diagnosis via scans, or finding patterns in large data sets – but it is not an advantage in the true sense of “smart.” AI does not show creativity, empathy, or common sense reasoning.
Currently, there is no scientific evidence or technological trajectory that ensures AI consciousness. Even if AI appears to be exhibiting emotions or decision-making, it is still simulation, not true awareness.
Humans learn with experience through emotions and social interactions. AI learns by accessing large-scale datasets and modifying algorithms. Humans generalize quickly; AI requires large-scale datasets, and still struggles to extend meaning across contextual shifts.
AI lacks morals, following programmed rules, or learned patterns. Ethical outcomes are determined by the humans who design, train, and oversee it.
At the Boston Institute of Analytics, with our partners of Boston College, we think that knowing the difference between artificial and human intelligence is important for navigating the future. Machines have demonstrated astonishingly well in certain areas, but whether or not machines can "think" like us will remain an open question. AI today may be processing data and discerning patterns beautifully, but AI lacks human thought's general intelligence, common sense, creativity, and consciousness.
Coming into the future comes down to leveraging the strengths of both AI and human intelligence, developing an awareness of that collaboration in practice, and the ethics of evolving intelligence in our machines. For those who want to jump in and be a part of the tech revolution, your first step is to enroll in an immersive Artificial Intelligence course. You will learn what AI is, how to contribute to AI, and ways to help affect the future of AI such that it enhances humanity as a whole. Join us at the Boston Institute of Analytics and jump into the world of intelligent machines!