NanoStack Technologies

Visit Website Write a Review Claim this Company

Details

Founded:: 2025
Hourly Rates:: Undisclosed
Employees:: 2 - 9
Ratings:: 4.4 8 Reviews

Industries Served

Agriculture Gaming & Gambling Events & Event Management Sports & Fitness Automotive Construction Energy & Utilities Information Technology

Where We Specialize

16% Testing Services

Testing Services 16%

No Code/ Low Code 14%

Virtual Reality 14%

Implementation Services 11%

Software Development 9%

AI Development 9%

Web3 9%

Mobile App Development 5%

Blockchain Development 5%

Web Development 4%

Bot Development 4%

Industry Expertise

Automotive57% Retail43%

Typical Project Size

43% Enterprise

43% Midmarket Business

14% Small Business

About

Businesses looking for a reliable technology partner often consider NanoStack Technologies. Their core services include Web Development and Mobile App Development. With 2 - 9 people on staff, NanoStack Technologies can take on projects of varying size. This profile is a starting point — reach out to NanoStack Technologies directly to discuss project specifics.

NanoStack Technologies Reviews

4.4 8 Reviews

Submit Review

Service

Industry

Project Cost

Sort By

They listened, asked the right questions, and delivered

Priya Fisher / Director | Oct 01, 2026

NanoStack Technologies did an excellent job for us. The team asked a lot of questions early on, which felt slow at first but meant there were very few surprises later. When we changed our minds on a couple of features halfway through, they handled it without fuss and were clear about the impact on cost and timeline. Their project manager kept things organised and was quick to flag anything that might affect the timeline.

The Software Development work has already made a noticeable difference — tasks that used to take hours now take minutes. Happy to recommend them.

Project summary

NanoStack Technologies was brought in to build a custom operations platform to replace the spreadsheets and email threads we were running the business on. They also took care of integrations with a couple of third-party tools we already used. The project took roughly 7 months from kickoff to launch.

Overall Rating 5.0
Quality 5.0
Schedule 4.5
Project Cost 5.0
Willing To Refer 5.0

Project Type:: Software Development
Project Cost:: Less than $10,000
Project Duration:: Feb 2026 - Sep 2026
Business Type:: Agriculture
Location:: Austin, USA

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.

Fairway Agri is a Agriculture business in Austin, USA. As Director, I was responsible for this project on our side and the main contact for NanoStack Technologies.

What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?

We had tried to do this internally and it stalled. We needed specialists to build a custom operations platform to replace the spreadsheets and email threads we were running the business on.

What services did the company provide for your project?

Mainly Software Development. They also helped with the technical planning and a few integrations with our existing tools.

Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?

We compared three or four agencies. NanoStack Technologies asked the best questions and had good reviews from past clients.

How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?

Well. There were a couple of points we had to clarify early on, but after that they were spot on.

How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?

Good. Weekly calls, regular updates and a shared board meant we always knew where things stood.

Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?

Yes. The only extra cost came from features we added ourselves, and they quoted those fairly.

What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?

Our team saves several hours a week, and we have had very few issues since launch.

What did you like most about working with this company?

That they were proactive — they suggested improvements instead of just doing what was asked.

Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?

Yes, I would recommend them and we plan to work with them again.

Great team to work with — professional, responsive and reliable

Ella Ngata / Senior Engineering Manager | Sep 14, 2026

Overall we had a good experience working with NanoStack Technologies. Even with the time zone difference, responses usually came the same day and we never felt left in the dark. They took the time to understand our business before suggesting anything, which we appreciated after previous agencies jumped straight into building.

The result looks great and performs well, and our internal team found it easy to take over. There were some early misunderstandings on requirements that took a few rounds to sort out. We are already discussing the next phase with them.

Project summary

NanoStack Technologies was brought in to build a custom operations platform to replace the spreadsheets and email threads we were running the business on. Scope included discovery workshops, development in two-week sprints and a short support period after launch. We worked together for around 4 months.

Overall Rating 4.0
Quality 4.0
Schedule 4.0
Project Cost 4.5
Willing To Refer 5.0

Project Type:: Software Development
Project Cost:: $500,000+
Project Duration:: Apr 2026 - Aug 2026
Business Type:: Gaming & Gambling
Location:: Wellington, New Zealand

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.

Lakeshore Games Ltd is a Gaming & Gambling business in Wellington, New Zealand. As Senior Engineering Manager, I was responsible for this project on our side and the main contact for NanoStack Technologies.

What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?

Our existing setup was holding us back. We wanted to build a custom operations platform to replace the spreadsheets and email threads we were running the business on before our busy season.

What services did the company provide for your project?

Mainly Software Development. They also helped with the technical planning and a few integrations with our existing tools.

Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?

We compared three or four agencies. NanoStack Technologies asked the best questions and had good reviews from past clients.

How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?

They understood our goals quickly, partly because they had worked with Gaming & Gambling clients before.

How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?

Communication was good overall and improved further once we settled into a routine.

Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?

It was delivered on time, and the final invoice matched the original estimate.

What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?

We can now handle more volume without adding staff, which was the main goal.

What did you like most about working with this company?

The consistency. Same team, same standard, from the first week to the last.

Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?

Yes. They are a reliable Software Development partner.

Dependable Low-Code / No-Code Development Partner for a Growing Events & Event Management Business

Sanne Meijer / CTO | Jul 23, 2026

The project went well overall. Communication was consistent. We had a weekly call, a shared Slack channel and a project board we could check at any time. The developers were knowledgeable and made a few suggestions that ended up saving us time and money. When we changed our minds on a couple of features halfway through, they handled it without fuss and were clear about the impact on cost and timeline.

Feedback from our customers has been very positive so far. Estimates on a few features were optimistic and those took longer than planned.

Happy to recommend them.

Project summary

We hired NanoStack Technologies to automate approval workflows using a no-code platform. Their team handled planning, development and QA, with our product owner signing off each milestone. The project took roughly 8 months from kickoff to launch.

Overall Rating 4.0
Quality 3.5
Schedule 3.5
Project Cost 4.0
Willing To Refer 5.0

Project Type:: Low-Code / No-Code Development
Project Cost:: $150,000 to $499,999
Project Duration:: Oct 2025 - Jun 2026
Business Type:: Events & Event Management
Location:: Eindhoven, Netherlands

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.

I work as CTO at Swift Productions BV. We operate in Events & Event Management and most of our customers are in and around Eindhoven, Netherlands.

What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?

Our team was spending too much time on manual work. The goal was to automate approval workflows using a no-code platform so they could focus on customers.

What services did the company provide for your project?

Low-Code / No-Code Development, plus QA and some consulting on how to structure the project.

Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?

They had relevant experience in Events & Event Management and their proposal was the clearest of the ones we received.

How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?

Very well. They asked a lot of questions upfront and turned our rough ideas into a clear plan.

How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?

Good. Weekly calls, regular updates and a shared board meant we always knew where things stood.

Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?

It was delivered on time, and the final invoice matched the original estimate.

What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?

We can now handle more volume without adding staff, which was the main goal.

What did you like most about working with this company?

The consistency. Same team, same standard, from the first week to the last.

Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?

Yes, I would recommend them and we plan to work with them again.

Would happily work with them again

Derek Price / CEO | Jun 17, 2026

NanoStack Technologies did good work for us, and we would use them again. We dealt with the same core team throughout, so we did not have to keep re-explaining things. They took the time to understand our business before suggesting anything, which we appreciated after previous agencies jumped straight into building.

We are already seeing better numbers than before the project. Estimates on a few features were optimistic and those took longer than planned. If you need a team that communicates well and delivers, they are a good choice.

Project summary

We hired NanoStack Technologies to develop a scheduling and dispatch tool for our field team. They worked alongside our in-house team, which mostly handled business requirements and testing. The project took roughly 3 months from kickoff to launch.

Overall Rating 4.0
Quality 4.0
Schedule 4.0
Project Cost 4.0
Willing To Refer 5.0

Project Type:: Software Development
Project Cost:: $10,000 to $49,999
Project Duration:: Mar 2026 - Jun 2026
Business Type:: Sports & Fitness
Location:: Charlotte, USA

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.

We're a mid-sized Sports & Fitness company based in Charlotte, USA. I'm the CEO and I oversaw the project from start to finish.

What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?

Our existing setup was holding us back. We wanted to develop a scheduling and dispatch tool for our field team before our busy season.

What services did the company provide for your project?

Software Development, plus QA and some consulting on how to structure the project.

Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?

They had relevant experience in Sports & Fitness and their proposal was the clearest of the ones we received.

How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?

Very well. They asked a lot of questions upfront and turned our rough ideas into a clear plan.

How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?

Organised and transparent. Their project manager kept the project on track and flagged risks early.

Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?

Mostly. One milestone slipped by about a week, but the final delivery was on schedule and the budget held.

What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?

It is still early, but the numbers are trending in the right direction and the system has been stable.

What did you like most about working with this company?

Their attention to detail and the quality of the final product.

Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?

Yes, I would recommend them and we plan to work with them again.

NanoStack Technologies Delivered a Quality Web Development Solution on Time

Nicole Price / Marketing Director | May 16, 2026

I would rate this engagement highly on almost every front. We dealt with the same core team throughout, so we did not have to keep re-explaining things. They shared working builds regularly, so we could test early and give feedback before things were locked in. The developers were knowledgeable and made a few suggestions that ended up saving us time and money.

Since launch, everything has been stable and our team has adapted to it quickly. Happy to recommend them.

Project summary

We hired NanoStack Technologies to build a customer portal where clients can log in, track orders and download invoices. Scope included discovery workshops, development in two-week sprints and a short support period after launch. The engagement ran for about 8 months.

Overall Rating 4.5
Quality 4.5
Schedule 4.5
Project Cost 4.5
Willing To Refer 5.0

Project Type:: Web Development
Project Cost:: $50,000 to $149,999
Project Duration:: Jul 2025 - Mar 2026
Business Type:: Automotive
Location:: Minneapolis, USA

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.

Cobalt Mobility is a Automotive business in Minneapolis, USA. As Marketing Director, I was responsible for this project on our side and the main contact for NanoStack Technologies.

What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?

Our team was spending too much time on manual work. The goal was to build a customer portal where clients can log in, track orders and download invoices so they could focus on customers.

What services did the company provide for your project?

Mainly Web Development. They also helped with the technical planning and a few integrations with our existing tools.

Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?

They had relevant experience in Automotive and their proposal was the clearest of the ones we received.

How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?

They understood our goals quickly, partly because they had worked with Automotive clients before.

How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?

Communication was good overall and improved further once we settled into a routine.

Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?

Yes, on time and within budget.

What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?

It is still early, but the numbers are trending in the right direction and the system has been stable.

What did you like most about working with this company?

The consistency. Same team, same standard, from the first week to the last.

Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?

Yes, I've already recommended them to a couple of people I know.

Solid delivery, though timelines needed some pushing

Amanda Coleman / Director | Mar 30, 2026

Overall the project was a success, though it was not without some challenges. Even with the time zone difference, responses usually came the same day and we never felt left in the dark. They took the time to understand our business before suggesting anything, which we appreciated after previous agencies jumped straight into building.

We launched on schedule and have not had any major issues since. Their team changed one developer midway, which slowed things down for a couple of weeks. We are already discussing the next phase with them.

Project summary

We engaged NanoStack Technologies to build internal tools on a low-code platform so our team could stop relying on spreadsheets. They worked alongside our in-house team, which mostly handled business requirements and testing. Overall it was a 5-month engagement.

Overall Rating 3.5
Quality 4.0
Schedule 3.5
Project Cost 3.5
Willing To Refer 5.0

Project Type:: Low-Code / No-Code Development
Project Cost:: $50,000 to $149,999
Project Duration:: Sep 2025 - Feb 2026
Business Type:: Construction
Location:: Dallas, USA

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.

I work as Director at Cobalt Construction. We operate in Construction and most of our customers are in and around Dallas, USA.

What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?

Our team was spending too much time on manual work. The goal was to build internal tools on a low-code platform so our team could stop relying on spreadsheets so they could focus on customers.

What services did the company provide for your project?

Low-Code / No-Code Development, plus QA and some consulting on how to structure the project.

Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?

A colleague recommended them, and our first calls confirmed they understood what we needed.